Why not go for ‘fatso’ instead?

Anne Milton, MP, who is minister for public health in the coalition government, spoke to the BBC on the subject of overweight people:

GPs and other health professionals should tell people they are fat rather than obese, England’s public health minister says.

Anne Milton told the BBC the term fat was more likely to motivate them into losing weight.

She said it was important people took “personal responsibility” for their lifestyles.

This seems to me to be a strikingly stupid thing to say.

Firstly, the words obese and fat are not synonyms.  The word fat applies to (and is commonly used to describe) people who range from could-do-with-losing-half-a-stone overweight all the way up to call-out-the-specially-strengthened-ambulance overweight.  Obese is a more precise term – it describes people who are sufficiently overweight that it impacts on their health.  If I see my GP and she tells me I’m fat, I might come away with the impression that I’m in the could-do-with-losing-half-a-stone camp when she meant me to understand that I was a couple of bags of cheese-and-onion away from needing the special ambulance.  If she describes me as obese – and explains what it means in detail, rather than assuming I know – then I know exactly where I stand.

Secondly, the word fat is insulting.  Not offensive – insulting.  It’s regularly used in this way: bullies in the school playground use it to attack their victims.  If the NHS is to go down the road of using insults to describe patients then presumably someone who’s short-sighted will be officially re-classified as a specky four-eyes, while a person with learning disabilities will be officially known as a retard.  The NHS’ ethnic monitoring forms will be a revelation – though how many people will be happy to tick boxes marked Paki and Honky I’m not sure.

It only takes a moment’s thought, of course, to realise that a person who believes themselves to have been insulted by their GP is highly unlikely to respond positively to whatever comes next from their mouth – assuming they haven’t walked straight out of the consultation, that is.  In the immediate aftermath of a personal insult, I’m not especially likely to accept a referral to a dietician, or pay much attention to a trite little homily about putting down the Hob Nobs and picking up the running shoes.  In fact, pretty much any consultation in which the doctor insists on bandying round insults is gong to rapidly degenerate into a confrontation.  I would have thought that this would not be especially useful from a clinical perspective, although it seems that Professor Steve Field, head of the Royal College of GPs, may not agree.  He is quoted by the BBC as saying

I think the term obese medicalises the state. It makes it a third person issue. I think we need to sometimes be more brutal and honest.

You can be popular by saying the things people want to hear and in the NHS we too often do that when we should be spelling things out clearly.

Inappropriate medicalisation is, of course, a buzz topic at the moment – hell, I’ve sounded off on this blog about the tendency to medicalise normal human emotion as depression often enough – but I’m not sure it’s legitimate to raise it in this case.  I mean, obesity is a medical issue – that’s the whole point.  The whole reason doctors get involved in discussing weight with their patients is that it’s not just an aesthetic matter, or a question of being discriminated against and bullied – it’s also, sometimes, a matter of chronic physiological ill-health: potentially, even, of life and death.

The ‘third person issue’ Professor Field raises is also a complete red-herring – a doctor who says “You’re obese” is speaking in the second person just as much as a doctor who says “You’re fat”, and she’s being just as honest, too.  The only difference is that, in the latter case, a precise clinical term has been exchanged for an imprecise insult.  I also have to question the extent to which ‘people want to hear’ that they’re obese, or that doctors who make a point of telling patients that they’re obese are ‘popular’.  I wonder if there’s a chance that Professor Field might have failed to recognise the difference between a patient reacting strongly to being insulted and a patient reacting strongly to an unpalatable truth about themselves which they hadn’t previously recognised.

It often seems as though the teams involved in the development of public health policy towards overweight people think that they don’t realise they’re overweight.  This is why, for those patients who don’t take slim-fit jeans, every GP consultation, whatever it’s for, has to include a discussion of weight.  The fact is, though, it’s literally impossible to be overweight in our culture and not know it.  You’re reminded of it every time you want to buy clothes and realise that there’s virtually nothing available in your size.  You’re reminded about the difference between your body-type and the ‘ideal’ every time you pick up a magazine, or watch a film or a TV show or an advert.  Every overweight patient a GP sees already knows they’re overweight.  The fact they’re still overweight, despite knowing all about it, means either that they don’t care, or they don’t know what to do about it, or they know what to do but are finding it hard to follow through.

None of these people are going to be helped if their doctors insult them.  At best it will irritate them, but at worst, for those patients who have body-image issues, it will reinforce every negative opinion they have of themselves.  In this context, it’s genuinely shocking to realise that the reason that Anne Milton wants the NHS to use the word fat is not because she thinks the use of such a direct word will act as a wake-up call to people who are deluding themselves (which seems to be, from what I can tell, Professor Field’s position).  She seems to want the NHS to use it because she actually wants to encourage negative body-image in overweight people:

If I look in the mirror and think I am obese I think I am less worried [than] if I think I am fat.

This, clearly, will be massively counter-productive in those people who already suffer from body dysmorphia, and also has the potential to push people who are on the threshold of the disorder into full-blown illness, but it’s wrong-headed even so far as it applies to the mainstream population.  The physical appearance of being overweight is the part that doesn’t matter – it doesn’t matter what I look like to myself, or to other people, and a sizeable proportion of overweight people will automatically (and quite reasonably) dismiss such appearance-based criticism.  The part of being overweight that matters is the probable impact on health, the fact that someone who’s overweight is at a statistically greater risk of developing type II diabetes, and heart disease, and stroke, and certain types of cancer.

None of these parts of being overweight show up in the mirror.  Certainly, they correlate with physical appearance, but, so far as public health is concerned, the focus should be on the invisible risks, not the fact that some people might find a particular body shape unattractive.  Quite apart from anything else, appearance is affected by so much more than weight – someone with a barrel chest is always going to look stocky, even if they restrict their diet to the point of near starvation.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Political commentary, Social commentary, Stuff I've read, The NHS. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Why not go for ‘fatso’ instead?

  1. J. Wibble says:

    I think a doctor calling someone fat would be hideously unprofessional, and agree that it’s unlikely to endear their patients to them. I have personally had one doctor who was willing to call me fat (to my face), and his behaviour and general reputation lead me to believe that the sort of doctor who would be prepared to do so is not the sort of doctor I want treating me or anyone else.

    As you point out, people know they are overweight, just as smokers know that smoking is bad for them, and it is extremely patronising to pretend otherwise. There is a case for clearly and tactfully explaining the potential health risks of obesity, along with some concrete advice on achieving sensible and sustainable weight loss (because let’s face it, there isn’t much about anywhere else), but to suggest that people are unable to comprehend such cerebral concepts and need to be spoken to in the same manner as schoolchildren are spoken to by other schoolchildren is insulting both to the patients and their doctors.

    The Daily Mash’s take on the issue is much more appropriate, I feel – though perhaps they need to revise their choice of words to avoid tarring decent, upstanding nutjobs like ourselves with the same shitty stick as these people. ;)

  2. aethelreadtheunread says:

    Hi J, and thanks for the comment. :o)

    I’m staggered by the unpleasantness of the doctor you encountered. I mean, it’s one thing to call a general member of the public ‘fat’, but to say it to someone with a psychiatric diagnosis is jaw-dropping. I mean, how ignorant would s/he have had to have been not to know that low self-esteem is a problem for pretty much everyone with a MH problem (not to mention the fact that weight gain is a side effect of a huge range of psychiatric medications)? I’m glad that you managed to find a better doctor.

    The Daily Mash are always good for a laugh, but i tend to agree with you – it’s insulting to psychos to be compared with Daily Mail readers… ;o)

  3. J. Wibble says:

    The doctor in question was a psychiatrist. Make of that what you will. (In all fairness he was a gender psych, and I’ve never known any other psych or indeed any other doctor to have a good word to say about them, but still.)

  4. beetrootsoup says:

    Very funny post Aethelread! I loved the notion of ticking the ‘ethnic’ boxes marked ‘Paki’ or ‘Honky’.

    We are governed by idiots. QED.

  5. I agree wholeheartedly, Aethelread!

    The sheer arrogance of this ex-district nurse who believes she ought to tell us how we should talk to our patients – who believes that substituting “fat” for “obese” would create personal responsibility in our patients!

    The reality, we know as GPs, is that the quality of our communication is a massive determinant in the outcomes we achieve for our patients. GPs who personally advise patients to stop smoking are providing them with a very powerful stimulus to change their behaviour. This is evidence based.

    GPs who empathise with their patients’ difficulties in making positive lifestyle choices are more likely to succeed in getting them to achieve these. Success is more likely when the GP engages with the patient to understand the importance of such changes – bringing an appreciation of the science into the art of influencing change. Then there is the need to address the patient’s confidence in being able to make the changes.

    The basic message is that your regular GP is already performing these sophisticated communication techniques to good effect. This is what we do. Our continuing relationship with our patients is what makes us aware of the need for a tailored approach to behaviour change. Above all, the best GPs do this in a collaborative style.

    We need no dumbed-down lessons from Anne Milton.

Comments are closed.